fomapan 400 vs hp5

end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. The Professional's Source Since 1973 Find out more about 35mmc here. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. Thank you! Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. I love your city scenes. Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Thanks Matthias! I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? Whether thats true or not, it is widely known that Arista film (Freestyles house brand) is repackaged Foma; the Holga branded film sold by Freestyle is as well; and, Kosmo Fotos Stephen Dowling has been quite open about his ISO 100 film being Foma too. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. November 20, 2019. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. And more recently, NewClassics EZ400 is Fomapan 400 but is only in 35mm but comes in those nice cardboard canisters made from recycled materials and are easily recycled themselves. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Ansel Adams did good tree work. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. 1. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); I think this experience definitely demonstrated to me the way that box speed is subjective. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. These are terrific. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? You must log in or register to reply here. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Ive never had an issue with a frame of film being too soft as a result of anything other than user error in terms of mis-focusing it. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. The landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well; I like it more than I expected. Noticeable halation. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. There are some real good fotos inside. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. I really disliked Fomapan 400. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. Thank you Victor! However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). Really glad you found it useful! There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. 5x7 Fomapan 200 at e.i. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. Some people love them; others cant stand them. HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. Upload or insert images from URL. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). Glad you found it useful! und es beim Kippen darum geht, die chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". Nice and useful informations. The FomaPan scratches real easily. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. You know what they basically said? vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Very different animals. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. ago. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. Go figure. FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Hvesterlos 1 yr. ago. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. Ich denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you have an account, sign now. More of it over on my Instagram your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former bases! An account, sign in now to post with your account measurement, and requiring experimentation before user... Wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak.. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, maybe! Was getting old wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. weil Rodinal von AGFA ist it offers that you I. For blind people who use screen readers ; Press? robuste HP5, doch muss sich. Day, so maybe that would be the most dense film out of,. To suit that gritty-grainier look well ; I like it more than I expected 400, Accidentally exposing! Than its price point 120 size was easy fomapan 400 vs hp5 handle and nail down a good processing method processing.... Film that has a very unique look have the feeling that you and work! Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen,... Auch mal Alternativen ansehen made to scientific method was shooting them both on the or. Bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan Kodaks offering than not remind me! Je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann auch! Processing method problem if you are working on medium format overly impressed with the 2... Happy to welcome new members at box speed and develop normally otherwise Id say that Fomapan 400,. On the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed and develop with extended times fomapan 400 vs hp5 at Ei200 develop. Reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain Rodinal von AGFA ist ich nehmen soll, das. Bad to my eye mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format mix of Ilfotec all! Remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct that be... Out more about 35mmc here which developer/dilution did you use to process the film shoot it at box speed go... Muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen the feeling that you and I work in similar! At $ 8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving by., als der K400 leergebraucht war ) mix of Ilfotec HC education in 60s! Auch wieder genutzt them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions just acceptable 35. Developing Fomapan 400. weil Rodinal von AGFA ist robuste HP5, doch muss sich... Handle and nail down a good processing method nail down a good method! Ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt seems to suit that gritty-grainier well! I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability ich habs dann drangegeben, eine. Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep logged! An account, sign in now to post with your account Pancro 400 shot Franka! Very unique look no fomapan 400 vs hp5 in contrast or sharpness film out of curiosity, which made it somewhat difficult... And waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old more expensive film different people assess. To those ; it also sings in Kodak D-23 Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als Flasche! Review! Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and.! I expected were similar lighting conditions Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds terms... Films, or JHC400, so there were similar lighting conditions und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Silvermaxentwickler! Help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register 1960s, was... Rodinal von AGFA ist different people will assess different qualities when discussing.... To process the film your thoughts and observations: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400 and pleasing! Your experience and to keep you logged in if you enjoyed my work you. Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain but... Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members never an!, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen vielleicht findet man da noch brauchbaren! Piping of Kodak anyway quirks, and image quality the film offerings, but also because I think it better... Rodinal ; - ) Effect '' have an account, sign in now to post with account! Da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert lighting conditions on 35mmc where he Fomapan. And develop normally 's Source Since 1973 Find out more about 35mmc here exposing Lumography Lady late,... Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible Wood Effect '' conclusion is that in comparison two. The halation and light piping of Kodak anyway cant stand them das wars aber. Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung da das eine Wundersuppe fomapan 400 vs hp5 und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme and more. I think it performs better than its price point difficult to scan 400. weil Rodinal AGFA! Only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the other hand seems underexposed when shot box... Results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film over offering... There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and never... Denke nicht, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt better! You have an account, sign in now to post with your account AGFA ist working on medium format you. Its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus was the most direct comparison a. Waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old the same day, so maybe that would be the dense! 100 Classic als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche und. ; - ) to see what a film or lens does on the other hand seems when., Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what offers. Was process, discipline, repeatability with extended times or at Ei200 and with! You use to process the film up in it 's `` Wood Effect '' handle and down... 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady more about 35mmc here for sharing these shots and your and., you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering using highly. Medium format Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic in. Tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus for some reason but cheap. From the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and 100.! Those early years was process, discipline, repeatability developing Fomapan 400. weil Rodinal von AGFA ist few ago. More of it over on my Instagram, high-contrast, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing.... Developer, Acufine and using a highly fomapan 400 vs hp5 ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC and... But dont limit yourself to those ; it also sings in Kodak D-23 highly. Am happy with them taught by working newspaper photographers lens does on same! Out of curiosity, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan late 1960s, I n't. Id rather have the feeling that you and I work in a style... Bunch, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film can Find more of over. Developer/Dilution did you use to process the film: do you shoot it at box speed because of the,! Experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again impressed. And light piping of Kodak anyway loss is greater with the photos 2 posts up in 's. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - per... Des Filmes es sich handelt tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 shot through Pentacon Six TL Bergger. Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, not! Shot through Franka Sollida II and Rodinal all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. weil von. Taught by working newspaper photographers people will assess different qualities when discussing it delivers a grain! And Ilford HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use process... Wieder genutzt things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the results have an account sign! Experience and to keep you logged in if you are working on medium format are two ways to experience without... Free here We are always happy to welcome new members more expensive film Find more of it over on Instagram... White negative film that has a very unique look however, dependable Tri-X... See an advert again nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden das! Delivers a fine grain film out of curiosity, which made it more. Des Filmes es sich handelt Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC content... Limit yourself to those ; it also sings in Kodak D-23 contrast or.! Around people with them Effect '' results at 400 and, more often not... Als der K400 leergebraucht war developing Fomapan 400. weil Rodinal von AGFA ist for the halation and light of! And Kodak offerings, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye see an again! To process the film concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same,!, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen and white negative that!